<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Watrous &#187; dedicated server hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielwatrous.com/tag/dedicated-server-hosting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between internet technology and internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web hosting comparison: Dedicated server hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/web-hosting-comparison-dedicated-server-hosting</link>
		<comments>http://www.danielwatrous.com/web-hosting-comparison-dedicated-server-hosting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedicated server hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielwatrous.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my ongoing analogy, a dedicated server would be a lot like a house or independent building.  This article builds on my web hosting comparison.  Getting a dedicated server is the first hosting option that doesn&#8217;t share a resource (strictly speaking, they all share resources, such as network bandwidth and electricity, but in the case [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my ongoing analogy, a dedicated server would be a lot like a house or independent building.  This article builds on my <a title="Web hosting comparison" href="http://www.danielwatrous.com/technology/web-hosting-comparison">web hosting comparison</a>.  Getting a dedicated server is the first hosting option that doesn&#8217;t share a resource (strictly speaking, they all share resources, such as network bandwidth and electricity, but in the case of a dedicated server you get completely isolated CPU, disk and memory resources).  A dedicated server is more expensive, in much the same way that owning a house is more expensive than renting an apartment or a motel room.  Many people look at a dedicated server as the final upgrade option.  While that&#8217;s not necessarily true, it brings up a valid point.  This is a big commitment.</p>
<h2>What they tell you</h2>
<p>Hosting companies will tell you that the dedicated server is the best you can do for a demanding site.  In some ways this is true, but it&#8217;s not the whole story.  A dedicated server also represents an increase in maintenance and a need for active monitoring.  Addressing some problems that come up with your own server can be expensive, time consuming and risky.  The old adage about giving you &#8220;just enough rope to hang yourself&#8221; can be very appropriate for dedicated servers.</p>
<p>As an example, I&#8217;ve observed several big product launches where a dedicated server was setup to process orders on launch day.  In each case they anticipated millions of dollars in sales.  On launch day their server crashed.  What happened?</p>
<p>A scenario like this makes for a great story about how not even a dedicated server could handle all the traffic.  But I don&#8217;t think they planned it (that would actually be pretty careless and could reduce their sales).  They simply failed to recognize a few basics.  Here they are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Whoever manages your dedicated server may not know as much as the guys that mange the shared hosting or VPS servers.  Managing a server is a lot more complicated than managing a website.</li>
<li>The two big factors that affect server performance are
<ul>
<li>The number of people that visit your site at one moment in time</li>
<li>The amount of processing that needs to happen for each visitor</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>How various technologies interact together.</li>
</ul>
<h2>A Bus can carry more people than a Car</h2>
<p>Here&#8217;s one way to look at it.  I&#8217;m a guy and so I&#8217;ll use a car analogy.  There are small economy cars, large trucks and then semi trailers and finally buses.  Each one has its purpose.  The entry level servers might be like a small economy car.  They give you the ability to decide exactly where you go and when.  You choose what you play on the radio and whether you tint the windows and roll like a &#8220;homey&#8221; (haha, did I say that right, dawg?).  The problem is that an economy car was designed to carry a few people at a time, not dozens.</p>
<p>The shared hosting servers are buses.  They&#8217;re designed from the start to accommodate lots of people doing different things at the same time.  But you don&#8217;t have as much control over the windows, the radio, etc.  Despite the fact that you have to share the space with others, there&#8217;s a natural ebb and flow that can actually give you more burst capacity than a dedicated server.  In other words, if you have 100 people come to your site at the same moment, a shared hosting environment may actually process those requests faster than a dedicated server.  This stops being the case when you have to sustain that load or your processing requirements become very complicated.</p>
<p>As you increase what you&#8217;re willing to pay for a dedicated server, you get more processors (CPUs), more memory and even faster components altogether.  Since you can use 100% of the resources in a dedicated server, a small increase in cost may give you big gains down the road.  There&#8217;s a point at which a dedicated server becomes a better choice for high traffic than shared hosting, but the price point might make other alternatives more appealing (for example, cloud computing).</p>
<h2>Good uses for a dedicated server</h2>
<p>If your business requires very custom software or has strict (even statutory) requirements about how you deal with customer data, then a custom server might be the right choice.  You might also have the need to setup several different environments that use a variety of resources.  Configuring these resources can be much easier in an isolated, dedicated environment.  However, you want to keep in mind that you can achieve a custom environment with a VPS at a much lower cost, but you can&#8217;t accommodate as many visitors.</p>
<p>For a single dedicated server the most significant impact on responsiveness and how much load it can handle before pooping out will be:</p>
<ul>
<li>Number of CPUs</li>
<li>Amount of memory (RAM)</li>
</ul>
<p>A machine with two CPUs can accommodate two visitors at the same time.  A machine with 16 CPUs can handle 16 visitors at the same time.  Now while that may not be exactly true, it&#8217;s a really good approximation, and as long as you don&#8217;t run out of memory or spend too much time waiting on the database, you can have a pretty responsive site.</p>
<h2>When not to have a dedicated server</h2>
<p>Dedicated servers, much like VPS plans, can buckle under heavy concurrent load.  Concurrent means many people at the same instant.  So if your website gets 100,000 visits per year and they are evenly spaced, then you&#8217;ll get by just fine.  However, if you were to get only 20,000 visits per year but they all came within a <em>two (2) hour window</em>, then a dedicated server might not be the best option.  <strong>Remember, it&#8217;s not the number of visitors to your site, but their proximity in time to one another that will determine the responsiveness of your server.</strong></p>
<h2>Alternatives</h2>
<p>If a dedicated server isn&#8217;t right for you then you might consider a <a title="shared web hosting" href="http://www.danielwatrous.com/technology/web-hosting-comparison-shared-hosting">shared hosting</a> or <a title="VPS web hosting" href="http://www.danielwatrous.com/technology/web-hosting-comparison-vps-hosting">VPS hosting</a> plan.  You could even move up to the granddaddy of them all.  THE CLOUD!</p>
<p>The term &#8220;cloud&#8221; makes some tech folks laugh, because there isn&#8217;t really such a thing as the cloud, but calling something a cloud and giving it a mystical power to absorb any amount of processing or traffic without breaking a sweat is downright awesome marketing fodder.  That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ll cover in my next article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danielwatrous.com/web-hosting-comparison-dedicated-server-hosting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Hosting Comparison (or how to understand web hosting)</title>
		<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/web-hosting-comparison</link>
		<comments>http://www.danielwatrous.com/web-hosting-comparison#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedicated server hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielwatrous.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#8217;t have to read this whole article As I write this article I expect that only a small percentage of people will have any reason to read beyond the third paragraph.  I&#8217;ll probably offend someone with the reason I give for this, but I invite you to prove me wrong.  Unfortunately the cards are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>You don&#8217;t have to read this whole article</h2>
<p>As I write this article I expect that only a small percentage of people will have any reason to read beyond the third paragraph.  I&#8217;ll probably offend someone with the reason I give for this, but I invite you to prove me wrong.  Unfortunately the cards are stacked against you and I have proof!  There&#8217;s an entire industry that gets fat off of you because it knows you so well.  I&#8217;ll get to my web hosting comparison in just a minute, but first, let&#8217;s talk about the real problem.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever searched for a web hosting company, you&#8217;ve probably been excited to find a ton of hosting companies that offer UNLIMITED everything.  That includes unlimited bandwidth, unlimited disk space, unlimited websites, etc.  I&#8217;m sure a lot of people assume that the blazing speeds of modern technology make it possible to process data instantaneously while consuming very few resources.  After all, how else could they provide unlimited everything for $5/month?</p>
<p>The answer is that they can only provide unlimited everything because they know a few things about their clients.  First is that you don&#8217;t produce content for your website regularly.  When you do produce content for your website you don&#8217;t create backlinks to it.  In fact you don&#8217;t do much at all to drive traffic to your site, which means you don&#8217;t get a lot of traffic and your site consumes virtually zero resources!  In short, it&#8217;s easy to offer someone unlimited everything when they know you will take advantage of almost nothing.  If this is you then stick with the cheapest shared hosting plan you can find and it will do everything you need.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re still with me, allow me to explain what I mean.  The fact is that there is no such thing as unlimited hosting.  The good hosting companies account for every electron that travels through their servers (almost).  For every CPU or MB of memory there are only so many web pages that a server can serve.  Every server has a limit.</p>
<h2>Let me compare web hosting to housing</h2>
<p>There are several types of hosting that range in price from FREE to hundreds of dollars per month.  Each of these different hosting models exists because there&#8217;s a niche to consume it.  Interestingly, very few people understand which type of hosting they should use or why.  Here are some of the most common (popular) hosting types:</p>
<ul>
<li>Shared</li>
<li>VPS</li>
<li>Dedicated server</li>
<li>Cloud or load balanced servers</li>
</ul>
<p>Within each of those hosting types there are tiers of options, but I&#8217;m going to discuss those in separate posts.  Today I want to explain some of the differences between these four top level hosting models.  The easiest way I can explain is with an analogy about housing.  Here&#8217;s the correspondence:</p>
<ul>
<li>Shared == Hotel/Motel</li>
<li>VPS == Apartment/Condominium</li>
<li>Dedicated server == House/Building</li>
<li>Cloud == Campus</li>
</ul>
<p>Just as Hotels and Motels come in a broad range, from ultra cheap and dirty to ultra luxury, so come the shared hosting plans.  Likewise for the others.  Within each category there are big swings in quality and features.  There are a few important things to get from these analogies.</p>
<p>First is that in a shared environment (think hotel/motel), what one person does in the hotel can potentially affect the others.  If one careless guest lights his room on fire, everyone in the whole place must evacuate.  If you&#8217;re staying in a cheap motel and the neighbors are making a lot of noise, you hear it too.  If you decide to eat a really smelly fish dinner in a hotel, the smell might waft into other rooms.  This thinking readily extends to amenities like a pool, hot tub, sauna, snack bar and so on.  What one person does affects the others.  So it is in a shared hosting  environment: what happens to one website affects the others.</p>
<p>As you move up into apartements, condos, houses and campuses, the effect you have on someone else (and their effect on you) is diminished.  The trade off is that your personal maintenance increases.  In a motel, you don&#8217;t have to care about the plumbing.  You don&#8217;t even have to make your own bed!  If there&#8217;s a problem with your room they get you to another room.  In an apartment a problem is more of a pain since you have to call the landlord and deal with it until he can send someone to fix it.  In a house you have to call the plumber yourself, or fix it yourself.  The repairs can be much more expensive too, especially since you&#8217;re not spreading the cost among a group.</p>
<p>The effort you go through with hosting correlates pretty well with my description of housing above.  If you use shared hosting you don&#8217;t have to worry about much at all.  If you use a VPS, you have to manage a little bit more and it&#8217;s more of a bother.  A dedicated server can require a lot of maintenance and expense to keep it running smoothly, and the cost of a load balanced cloud system can be pretty high.  Hopefully you&#8217;re starting to see that to make the best decision requires more than just a web hosting comparison.  You need to accurately identify your needs in the first place.</p>
<h2>My site is so slow</h2>
<p>One of the most common complaints about web hosting is &#8220;my site isn&#8217;t fast&#8221;.  There are literally an endless number of reasons this could be.  Some have to do with the hosting provider, some have to do with what you&#8217;re trying to host.  Some may not have anything to do with you or your host, but are actually caused by other people hosting on that same server.  Even other reasons may have to do with your internet service or global  internet issues.</p>
<p>The most common reason that a site will slow down is that there are too many visitors at one time.  To understand this, you want to think about the checkout at your local supermarket.  If you have a small shop with a single checkout and five people want to checkout at the same time, you end up with a line.  A web site is no different.  If you have five people that all want to view a web page at the same time, they have to get in line.  Fortunately, a web page can load faster than you can checkout at the supermarket, but they still line up and get served one at a time.</p>
<p>What might surprise you is that the number of visitors that come to your site is NOT as important as when they come.  If you take two sites that both get 10,000 visitors per day, where one gets all of its visitors between 8:00 am and 9:00 am (in one hour) and the other gets those same visitors evenly spread out throughout the day, you have very different needs.  The site that receives all it&#8217;s visitors in the same hour will need significantly more resources than the site that has them evenly spread out.  In fact, the cost to host the site with all the visitors in one hour could be 10 or 20 times more than the other site.  Just like the supermarket, during a big sale they&#8217;ll need to open more checkout lines.  but even with more checkout lines you might still have to wait (it always feels like this at Wal-mart).</p>
<h2>This is why product launches crash servers</h2>
<p>This is why product launches crash servers.  If you&#8217;ve ever watched a big launch for a new product and found your way to their server at the launch minute, you probably noticed that the pages load slow or perhaps not at all.  It&#8217;s not a stunt or trick aimed at convincing you that their product is popular (that would be a risky trick to pull on people interested in giving you their money).  The fact is that they&#8217;re trying to accommodate the rush.  It&#8217;s as if several thousand people came to Wal-mart at the exact same moment to buy a new video game console.  They form a line and get served one by one.  The same thing happens when a new movie comes out.  You end up with long lines.  For some reason the idea of standing in line makes sense to people in a physical (real) world sense, but they think technology is different.  Turns out it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Another surprise is that revenue doesn&#8217;t necessarily track with the cost of  hosting and expensive hosting doesn&#8217;t guarantee revenue.  As strange as it sounds, one guy might be able to host a low traffic site on a free shared hosting account (I don&#8217;t recommend this for commercial projects, by the way) and make a full time living, while another would have to pay hundreds of dollars a month to accommodate traffic that produced barely enough revenue to cover the hosting costs.  By the way, if you&#8217;re doing that I recommend you rethink your plan or find a new niche.</p>
<p>In the next few articles I&#8217;m going to continue my web hosting comparison and explain each of the four hosting models I mentioned above in a way that helps you know why you would need one or the other.  A well informed decision can save you time, money and a lot of headache from lost opportunity or traffic.</p>
<p>If you have something specific that you want me to cover, leave a comment blow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danielwatrous.com/web-hosting-comparison/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

