<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PRWeb.com results disappoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielwatrous.com/prweb-results-disappoint/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/prweb-results-disappoint</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between internet technology and internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:33:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/prweb-results-disappoint#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielwatrous.com/?p=90#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Frank,

Thanks for pitching in.  I&#039;m sure those links will be very helpful for people that read this post.  I think you&#039;re right that I was lacking in strategy.  Hopefully my post points that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>Thanks for pitching in.  I&#8217;m sure those links will be very helpful for people that read this post.  I think you&#8217;re right that I was lacking in strategy.  Hopefully my post points that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/prweb-results-disappoint#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielwatrous.com/?p=90#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel -- thanks for a very thoughtful post -- clearly you&#039;ve put some time into this.  There are, as you point out, a variety of factors that can impact your results, targeting, timing, content, newsworthiness and appropriate search terms among others.  One thing we at PRWeb try to encourage is to get clients thinking about a strategy, rather than just issuing one off releases.  There are also a wealth of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/pr/press-release-tip/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;useful tips on PRWeb.com&lt;/a&gt; that might be helpful.  In addition, I&#039;d offer up these case studies for consideration.  http://bit.ly/83sUkn  and http://bit.ly/53pOtZ.

For disclosure purposes, I am the director of PR for Vocus and PRWeb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel &#8212; thanks for a very thoughtful post &#8212; clearly you&#8217;ve put some time into this.  There are, as you point out, a variety of factors that can impact your results, targeting, timing, content, newsworthiness and appropriate search terms among others.  One thing we at PRWeb try to encourage is to get clients thinking about a strategy, rather than just issuing one off releases.  There are also a wealth of <a href="http://www.prweb.com/pr/press-release-tip/index.html" rel="nofollow">useful tips on PRWeb.com</a> that might be helpful.  In addition, I&#8217;d offer up these case studies for consideration.  <a href="http://bit.ly/83sUkn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/83sUkn</a>  and <a href="http://bit.ly/53pOtZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/53pOtZ</a>.</p>
<p>For disclosure purposes, I am the director of PR for Vocus and PRWeb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creepy Google Stalker &#8211; interest based advertising &#124; Daniel Watrous</title>
		<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/prweb-results-disappoint#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Creepy Google Stalker &#8211; interest based advertising &#124; Daniel Watrous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielwatrous.com/?p=90#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] PRWeb.com results disappoint [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PRWeb.com results disappoint [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.danielwatrous.com/prweb-results-disappoint#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielwatrous.com/?p=90#comment-110</guid>
		<description>In my limited experience with PRWeb, I didn&#039;t see significant traffic right away, but now 19 months after I did a release through them, I still pick up a few visitors to one of my sites from the PRWeb &#039;archives&#039; or other outlets picking up the old release.

While you might look at it as a fiasco, much as I originally did, but I found that my releases with PRWeb create backlinks long term, and still get picked up, used and seen by prospective visitors many months after the release.  Even when it is a time related release.

One release I know of was released when my cousin was running for Congress in 2004.  It&#039;s STILL being picked up from time to time (Last pickup we&#039;ve seen was December 2009), and when it gets picked up somewhere, there&#039;s usually a little traffic to his old campaign site.  Even though he chose not to run again since then.

Hopefully this helps put it into perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my limited experience with PRWeb, I didn&#8217;t see significant traffic right away, but now 19 months after I did a release through them, I still pick up a few visitors to one of my sites from the PRWeb &#8216;archives&#8217; or other outlets picking up the old release.</p>
<p>While you might look at it as a fiasco, much as I originally did, but I found that my releases with PRWeb create backlinks long term, and still get picked up, used and seen by prospective visitors many months after the release.  Even when it is a time related release.</p>
<p>One release I know of was released when my cousin was running for Congress in 2004.  It&#8217;s STILL being picked up from time to time (Last pickup we&#8217;ve seen was December 2009), and when it gets picked up somewhere, there&#8217;s usually a little traffic to his old campaign site.  Even though he chose not to run again since then.</p>
<p>Hopefully this helps put it into perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
